Paper detail

Ratio of photon anisotropic flow in relativistic heavy ion collisions

The $p_T$ dependent elliptic and triangular flow parameters of direct photons are known to be dominated by thermal radiations. The non-thermal contributions dilute the photon anisotropic flow by adding extra weight factor in the $v_n$ calculation. The discrepancy between experimental photon anisotropic flow data and results from theoretical model calculations is not well understood even after significant developments in the model calculations as well as in the experimental analysis. We show that the ratio of photon $v_n$ can be a potential observable in this regard by minimizing the uncertainties arising due to the non-thermal contributions. We calculate the $v_2/v_3$ of photons as a function of $p_T$ from heavy ion collisions at RHIC and compare the results with available experimental data. The ratio does not change significantly $p_T$ in the region $p_T>2$ GeV. However, it rises towards smaller $p_T$ ($< 2$ GeV) values. The ratio is found to be larger for peripheral collisions than for central collisions. In addition, it is found to be sensitive to the initial formation time and the final freeze-out temperature at different $p_T$ regions unlike the individual anisotropic flow parameters. We show that the photon $v_1/v_2$ and $v_1/v_3$ along with the $v_2/v_3$ results may help us constraining the initial conditions.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.