Paper detail

Rate of Estimation for the Stationary Distribution of Stochastic Damping Hamiltonian Systems with Continuous Observations

We study the problem of the non-parametric estimation for the density $π$ of the stationary distribution of a stochastic two-dimensional damping Hamiltonian system $(Z_t)_{t\in[0,T]}=(X_t,Y_t)_{t \in [0,T]}$. From the continuous observation of the sampling path on $[0,T]$, we study the rate of estimation for $π(x_0,y_0)$ as $T \to \infty$. We show that kernel based estimators can achieve the rate $T^{-v}$ for some explicit exponent $v \in (0,1/2)$. One finding is that the rate of estimation depends on the smoothness of $π$ and is completely different with the rate appearing in the standard i.i.d.\ setting or in the case of two-dimensional non degenerate diffusion processes. Especially, this rate depends also on $y_0$. Moreover, we obtain a minimax lower bound on the $L^2$-risk for pointwise estimation, with the same rate $T^{-v}$, up to $\log(T)$ terms.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.