Paper detail

Rate-Memory Trade-off for Multi-access Coded Caching with Uncoded Placement

We study a multi-access variant of the popular coded caching framework, which consists of a central server with a catalog of $N$ files, $K$ caches with limited memory $M$, and $K$ users such that each user has access to $L$ consecutive caches with a cyclic wrap-around and requests one file from the central server's catalog. The server assists in file delivery by transmitting a message of size $R$ over a shared error-free link and the goal is to characterize the optimal rate-memory trade-off. This setup was studied previously by Hachem et al., where an achievable rate and an information-theoretic lower bound were derived. However, the multiplicative gap between them was shown to scale linearly with the access degree $L$ and thus order-optimality could not be established. A series of recent works have used a natural mapping of the coded caching problem to the well-known index coding problem to derive tighter characterizations of the optimal rate-memory trade-off under the additional assumption that the caches store uncoded content. We follow a similar strategy for the multi-access framework and provide new bounds for the optimal rate-memory trade-off $R^*(M)$ over all uncoded placement policies. In particular, we derive a new achievable rate for any $L \ge 1$ and a new lower bound, which works for any uncoded placement policy and $L \ge K/2$. We then establish that the (multiplicative) gap between the new achievable rate and the lower bound is at most $2$ independent of all parameters, thus establishing an order-optimal characterization of $R^*(M)$ for any $L\ge K/2$. This is a significant improvement over the previously known gap result, albeit under the restriction of uncoded placement policies. Finally, we also characterize $R^*(M)$ exactly for a few special cases.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.