Paper detail

Rate-Exponent Region for a Class of Distributed Hypothesis Testing Against Conditional Independence Problems

We study a class of $K$-encoder hypothesis testing against conditional independence problems. Under the criterion that stipulates minimization of the Type II error subject to a (constant) upper bound $ε$ on the Type I error, we characterize the set of encoding rates and exponent for both discrete memoryless and memoryless vector Gaussian settings. For the DM setting, we provide a converse proof and show that it is achieved using the Quantize-Bin-Test scheme of Rahman and Wagner. For the memoryless vector Gaussian setting, we develop a tight outer bound by means of a technique that relies on the de Bruijn identity and the properties of Fisher information. In particular, the result shows that for memoryless vector Gaussian sources the rate-exponent region is exhausted using the Quantize-Bin-Test scheme with \textit{Gaussian} test channels; and there is \textit{no} loss in performance caused by restricting the sensors' encoders not to employ time sharing. Furthermore, we also study a variant of the problem in which the source, not necessarily Gaussian, has finite differential entropy and the sensors' observations noises under the null hypothesis are Gaussian. For this model, our main result is an upper bound on the exponent-rate function. The bound is shown to mirror a corresponding explicit lower bound, except that the lower bound involves the source power (variance) whereas the upper bound has the source entropy power. Part of the utility of the established bound is for investigating asymptotic exponent/rates and losses incurred by distributed detection as function of the number of sensors.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.