Paper detail

Ranking in the generalized Bradley-Terry models when the strong connection condition fails

For nonbalanced paired comparisons, a wide variety of ranking methods have been proposed. One of the best popular methods is the Bradley-Terry model in which the ranking of a set of objects is decided by the maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) of merits parameters. However, the existence of MLE for the Bradley-Terry model and its generalized models to allow for tied observation or home-field advantage or both to occur, crucially depends on the strong connection condition on the directed graph constructed by a win-loss matrix. When this condition fails, the MLE does not exist and hence there is no solution of ranking. In this paper, we propose an improved version of the $\varepsilon$ singular perturbation proposed by Conner and Grant (2000), to address this problem and extend it to the generalized Bradley-Terry models. Some necessary and sufficient conditions for the existence and uniqueness of the penalized MLEs for these generalized Bradley-Terry-$\varepsilon$ models are derived. Numerical studies show that the ranking is robust to the different $\varepsilon$. We apply the proposed methods to the data of the 2008 NFL regular season.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.