Paper detail

Rank tests for time-varying covariance matrices observed under noise

We consider a $d$-dimensional continuous martingale $X(t)$ with quadratic variation matrix $\langle X\rangle_t=\int_0^t Σ(s)\,ds$ and develop tests for the rank of its spot covariance matrix $Σ(t)$, $t\in[0,1]$. The process $X$ is observed under observational noise, as is standard for microstructure noise models in high-frequency finance. We test the null hypothesis ${\mathcal H}_0:rank(Σ(t))\le r$ against local alternatives ${\mathcal H}_{1,n}:λ_{r+1}(Σ(t))\ge v_n$, where $λ_{r+1}$ denotes the $(r+1)$st eigenvalue and $v_n\downarrow 0$ as the sample size $n\to\infty$. We construct test statistics based on eigenvalues of carefully calibrated localized spectral covariance matrix estimates. Critical values are provided non-asymptotically as well as asymptotically via maximal eigenvalues of Gaussian orthogonal ensembles. The power analysis establishes asymptotic consistency for a separation rate $v_n\thicksim (\underlineλ_r^{-1/(β+1)}n^{-β/(β+1)})\wedge n^{-β/(β+2)}$, depending on the Hölder-regularity $β$ of $Σ$ and a possible spectral gap $\underlineλ_r\ge 0$ under ${\mathcal H}_0$. A lower bound shows the optimality of this rate. We discuss why the rate is much faster than conventional estimation rates. The theory is illustrated by simulations and a real data example with German government bonds of varying maturity.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.