Paper detail

Rank error-correcting pairs

Error-correcting pairs were introduced independently by Pellikaan and Kötter as a general method of decoding linear codes with respect to the Hamming metric using coordinatewise products of vectors, and are used for many well-known families of codes. In this paper, we define new types of vector products, extending the coordinatewise product, some of which preserve symbolic products of linearized polynomials after evaluation and some of which coincide with usual products of matrices. Then we define rank error-correcting pairs for codes that are linear over the extension field and for codes that are linear over the base field, and relate both types. Bounds on the minimum rank distance of codes and MRD conditions are given. Finally we show that some well-known families of rank-metric codes admit rank error-correcting pairs, and show that the given algorithm generalizes the classical algorithm using error-correcting pairs for the Hamming metric.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.