Paper detail

Range Majorities and Minorities in Arrays

Karpinski and Nekrich (2008) introduced the problem of parameterized range majority, which asks us to preprocess a string of length $n$ such that, given the endpoints of a range, one can quickly find all the distinct elements whose relative frequencies in that range are more than a threshold $τ$. Subsequent authors have reduced their time and space bounds such that, when $τ$ is fixed at preprocessing time, we need either $O(n \log (1 / τ))$ space and optimal $O(1 / τ)$ query time or linear space and $O((1 / τ) \log \log σ)$ query time, where $σ$ is the alphabet size. In this paper we give the first linear-space solution with optimal $O(1 / τ)$ query time, even with variable $τ$ (i.e., specified with the query). For the case when $σ$ is polynomial on the computer word size, our space is optimally compressed according to the symbol frequencies in the string. Otherwise, either the compressed space is increased by an arbitrarily small constant factor or the time rises to any function in $(1/τ)\cdotω(1)$. We obtain the same results on the complementary problem of parameterized range minority introduced by Chan et al. (2015), who had achieved linear space and $O(1 / τ)$ query time with variable $τ$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.