BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

J. Ian Munro

J. Ian Munro contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
Data Structures and AlgorithmsComputational Geometry

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

On Huang and Wong's Algorithm for Generalized Binary Split Trees

Huang and Wong [1984] proposed a polynomial-time dynamic-programming algorithm for computing optimal generalized binary split trees. We show that their algorithm is incorrect. Thus, it remains open whether such trees can be computed in polynomial time. Spuler [1994] proposed modifying Huang and Wong's algorithm to obtain an algorithm for a different problem: computing optimal two-way-comparison search trees. We show that the dynamic program underlying Spuler's algorithm is not valid, in that it does not satisfy the necessary optimal-substructure property and its proposed recurrence relation is incorrect. It remains unknown whether the algorithm is guaranteed to compute a correct overall solution.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

A Simple Algorithm for Optimal Search Trees with Two-Way Comparisons

We present a simple $O(n^4)$-time algorithm for computing optimal search trees with two-way comparisons. The only previous solution to this problem, by Anderson et al., has the same running time, but is significantly more complicated and is restricted to the variant where only successful queries are allowed. Our algorithm extends directly to solve the standard full variant of the problem, which also allows unsuccessful queries and for which no polynomial-time algorithm was previously known. The correctness proof of our algorithm relies on a new structural theorem for two-way-comparison search trees.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

On the Cost of Unsuccessful Searches in Search Trees with Two-way Comparisons

Search trees are commonly used to implement access operations to a set of stored keys. If this set is static and the probabilities of membership queries are known in advance, then one can precompute an optimal search tree, namely one that minimizes the expected access cost. For a non-key query, a search tree can determine its approximate location by returning the inter-key interval containing the query. This is in contrast to other dictionary data structures, like hash tables, that only report a failed search. We address the question "what is the additional cost of determining approximate locations for non-key queries"? We prove that for two-way comparison trees this additional cost is at most 1. Our proof is based on a novel probabilistic argument that involves converting a search tree that does not identify non-key queries into a random tree that does.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Optimal Search Trees with 2-Way Comparisons

In 1971, Knuth gave an $O(n^2)$-time algorithm for the classic problem of finding an optimal binary search tree. Knuth&#39;s algorithm works only for search trees based on 3-way comparisons, while most modern computers support only 2-way comparisons (e.g., $<, \le, =, \ge$, and $>$). Until this paper, the problem of finding an optimal search tree using 2-way comparisons remained open -- poly-time algorithms were known only for restricted variants. We solve the general case, giving (i) an $O(n^4)$-time algorithm and (ii) an $O(n \log n)$-time additive-3 approximation algorithm. Also, for finding optimal binary split trees, we (iii) obtain a linear speedup and (iv) prove some previous work incorrect.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Space-Efficient Data Structures for Lattices

A lattice is a partially-ordered set in which every pair of elements has a unique meet (greatest lower bound) and join (least upper bound). We present new data structures for lattices that are simple, efficient, and nearly optimal in terms of space complexity. Our first data structure can answer partial order queries in constant time and find the meet or join of two elements in $O(n^{3/4})$ time, where $n$ is the number of elements in the lattice. It occupies $O(n^{3/2}\log n)$ bits of space, which is only a $Θ(\log n)$ factor from the $Θ(n^{3/2})$-bit lower bound for storing lattices. The preprocessing time is $O(n^2)$. This structure admits a simple space-time tradeoff so that, for any $c \in [\frac{1}{2}, 1]$, the data structure supports meet and join queries in $O(n^{1-c/2})$ time, occupies $O(n^{1+c}\log n)$ bits of space, and can be constructed in $O(n^2 + n^{1+3c/2})$ time. Our second data structure uses $O(n^{3/2}\log n)$ bits of space and supports meet and join in $O(d \frac{\log n}{\log d})$ time, where $d$ is the maximum degree of any element in the transitive reduction graph of the lattice. This structure is much faster for lattices with low-degree elements. This paper also identifies an error in a long-standing solution to the problem of representing lattices. We discuss the issue with this previous work.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Range Reporting for Moving Points on a Grid

In this paper we describe a new data structure that supports orthogonal range reporting queries on a set of points that move along linear trajectories on a $U\times U$ grid. The assumption that points lie on a $U\times U$ grid enables us to significantly decrease the query time in comparison to the standard kinetic model. Our data structure answers queries in $O(\sqrt{\log U/\log \log U}+k)$ time, where $k$ denotes the number of points in the answer. The above improves over the $Ω(\log n)$ lower bound that is valid in the infinite-precision kinetic model. The methods used in this paper could be also of independent interest.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2010arXiv

Succinct Representations of Dynamic Strings

The rank and select operations over a string of length n from an alphabet of size $σ$ have been used widely in the design of succinct data structures. In many applications, the string itself need be maintained dynamically, allowing characters of the string to be inserted and deleted. Under the word RAM model with word size $w=Ω(\lg n)$, we design a succinct representation of dynamic strings using $nH_0 + o(n)\lgσ+ O(w)$ bits to support rank, select, insert and delete in $O(\frac{\lg n}{\lg\lg n}(\frac{\lg σ}{\lg\lg n}+1))$ time. When the alphabet size is small, i.e. when $σ= O(\polylog (n))$, including the case in which the string is a bit vector, these operations are supported in $O(\frac{\lg n}{\lg\lg n})$ time. Our data structures are more efficient than previous results on the same problem, and we have applied them to improve results on the design and construction of space-efficient text indexes.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2009arXiv

An Efficient Algorithm for Partial Order Production

We consider the problem of partial order production: arrange the elements of an unknown totally ordered set T into a target partially ordered set S, by comparing a minimum number of pairs in T. Special cases include sorting by comparisons, selection, multiple selection, and heap construction. We give an algorithm performing ITLB + o(ITLB) + O(n) comparisons in the worst case. Here, n denotes the size of the ground sets, and ITLB denotes a natural information-theoretic lower bound on the number of comparisons needed to produce the target partial order. Our approach is to replace the target partial order by a weak order (that is, a partial order with a layered structure) extending it, without increasing the information theoretic lower bound too much. We then solve the problem by applying an efficient multiple selection algorithm. The overall complexity of our algorithm is polynomial. This answers a question of Yao (SIAM J. Comput. 18, 1989). We base our analysis on the entropy of the target partial order, a quantity that can be efficiently computed and provides a good estimate of the information-theoretic lower bound.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access