Paper detail

Randomness-Efficient Rumor Spreading

We study the classical rumor spreading problem, which is used to spread information in an unknown network with $n$ nodes. We present the first protocol for any expander graph $G$ with $n$ nodes and minimum degree $Θ(n)$ such that, the protocol informs every node in $O(\log n)$ rounds with high probability, and uses $O(\log n\log\log n)$ random bits in total. The runtime of our protocol is tight, and the randomness requirement of $O(\log n\log\log n)$ random bits almost matches the lower bound of $Ω(\log n)$ random bits. We further study rumor spreading protocols for more general graphs, and for several graph topologies our protocols are as fast as the classical protocol and use $\tilde{O}(\log n)$ random bits in total, in contrast to $O(n\log^2n)$ random bits used in the well-known rumor spreading push protocol. These results together give us almost full understanding of the randomness requirement for this basic epidemic process. Our protocols rely on a novel reduction between rumor spreading processes and branching programs, and this reduction provides a general framework to derandomize these complex and distributed epidemic processes. Interestingly, one cannot simply apply PRGs for branching programs as rumor spreading process is not characterized by small-space computation. Our protocols require the composition of several pseudorandom objects, e.g. pseudorandom generators, and pairwise independent generators. Besides designing rumor spreading protocols, the techniques developed here may have applications in studying the randomness complexity of distributed algorithms.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.