Paper detail

Randomized Predictive P-values: A Versatile Model Diagnostic Tool with Unified Reference Distribution

Examining residuals such as Pearson and deviance residuals, is a standard tool for assessing normal regression. However, for discrete response, these residuals cluster on lines corresponding to distinct response values. Their distributions are far from normality; graphical and quantitative inspection of these residuals provides little information for model diagnosis. Marshall and Spiegelhalter (2003) defined a cross-validatory predictive p-value for identifying outliers. Predictive p-values are uniformly distributed for continuous response but not for discrete response. We propose to use randomized predictive p-values (RPP) for diagnosing models with discrete responses. RPPs can be transformed to "residuals" with normal distribution, called NRPPs by us. NRPPs can be used to diagnose all regression models with scalar response using the same way for diagnosing normal regression. The NRPPs are nearly the same as the randomized quantile residuals (RQR), which are previously proposed by Dunn and Smyth (1996) but remain little known by statisticians. This paper provides an exposition of RQR using the RPP perspective. The contributions of this exposition include: (1) we give a rigorous proof of uniformity of RPP and illustrative examples to explain the uniformity under the true model; (2) we conduct extensive simulation studies to demonstrate the normality of NRPPs under the true model; (3) our simulation studies also show that the NRPP method is a versatile diagnostic tool for detecting many kinds of model inadequacies due to lack of complexity. The effectiveness of NRPP is further demonstrated with a health utilization dataset.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.