Paper detail

Random words in free groups, non-crossing matchings and RNA secondary structures

Consider a random word $X^n=(X_1,\ldots ,X_n)$ in an alphabet consisting of $4$ letters, with the letters viewed either as $A$, $U$, $G$ and $C$ (i.e., nucleotides in an RNA sequence) or $α$, $\barα$, $β$ and $\barβ$ (i.e., generators of the free group $\langleα,β\rangle$ and their inverses). We show that the expected fraction $ρ(n)$ of unpaired bases in an optimal RNA secondary structure (with only Watson-Crick bonds and no pseudo-knots) converges to a constant $λ_2$ with $0<λ_2<1$ as $n\to\infty$. Thus, a positive proportion of the bases of a random RNA string do not form hydrogen bonds. We do not know the exact value of $λ_2$, but we derive upper and lower bounds for it. In terms of free groups, $ρ(n)$ is the ratio of the length of the shortest word representing $X$ in the generating set consisting of conjugates of generators and their inverses to the word length of $X$ with respect to the standard generators and their inverses. Thus for a typical word the word length in the (infinite) generating set consisting of the conjugates of standard generators grows linearly with the word length in the standard generators. In fact, we show that a similar result holds for all non-abelian finitely generated free groups $\langleα_1,\dots,α_k\rangle$, $k\geq 2$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.