Paper detail

Random Sequential Renormalization and Agglomerative Percolation in Networks: Application to Erd"os-R'enyi and Scale-free Graphs

We study the statistical behavior under random sequential renormalization(RSR) of several network models including Erd"os R'enyi (ER) graphs, scale-free networks and an annealed model (AM) related to ER graphs. In RSR the network is locally coarse grained by choosing at each renormalization step a node at random and joining it to all its neighbors. Compared to previous (quasi-)parallel renormalization methods [C.Song et.al], RSR allows a more fine-grained analysis of the renormalization group (RG) flow, and unravels new features, that were not discussed in the previous analyses. In particular we find that all networks exhibit a second order transition in their RG flow. This phase transition is associated with the emergence of a giant hub and can be viewed as a new variant of percolation, called agglomerative percolation. We claim that this transition exists also in previous graph renormalization schemes and explains some of the scaling laws seen there. For critical trees it happens as N/N0 -> 0 in the limit of large systems (where N0 is the initial size of the graph and N its size at a given RSR step). In contrast, it happens at finite N/N0 in sparse ER graphs and in the annealed model, while it happens for N/N0 -> 1 on scale-free networks. Critical exponents seem to depend on the type of the graph but not on the average degree and obey usual scaling relations for percolation phenomena. For the annealed model they agree with the exponents obtained from a mean-field theory. At late times, the networks exhibit a star-like structure in agreement with the results of Radicchi et. al. While degree distributions are of main interest when regarding the scheme as network renormalization, mass distributions (which are more relevant when considering 'supernodes' as clusters) are much easier to study using the fast Newman-Ziff algorithm for percolation, allowing us to obtain very high statistics.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.