Paper detail

Random sequential adsorption of straight rigid rods on a simple cubic lattice

Random sequential adsorption of straight rigid rods of length $k$ ($k$-mers) on a simple cubic lattice has been studied by numerical simulations and finite-size scaling analysis. The calculations were performed by using a new theoretical scheme, whose accuracy was verified by comparison with rigorous analytical data. The results, obtained for \textit{k} ranging from 2 to 64, revealed that (i) in the case of dimers ($k=2$), the jamming coverage is $θ_j=0.918388(16)$. Our estimate of $θ_j$ differs significantly from the previously reported value of $θ_j=0.799(2)$ [Y. Y. Tarasevich and V. A. Cherkasova, Eur. Phys. J. B \textbf{60}, 97 (2007)]; (ii) $θ_j$ exhibits a decreasing function when it is plotted in terms of the $k$-mer size, being $θ_j (\infty)= 0.4045(19)$ the value of the limit coverage for large $k$'s; and (iii) the ratio between percolation threshold and jamming coverage shows a non-universal behavior, monotonically decreasing with increasing $k$.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.