Paper detail

Random section and random simplex inequality

Consider some convex body $K\subset\mathbb R^d$. Let $X_1,\dots, X_k$, where $k\leq d$, be random points independently and uniformly chosen in $K$, and let $ξ_k$ be a uniformly distributed random linear $k$-plane. We show that for $p\geq-d+k+1$, \[ \mathbb E\,|K\capξ_k|^{d+p}\leq c_{d,k,p} \cdot|K|^k\, \,\mathbb E\,|\mathrm{conv}(0,X_1, \dots,X_k)|^p, \] where $|\cdot|$ and $\mathrm{conv}$ denote the volume of correspondent dimension and the convex hull. The constant $c_{d,k,p}$ is such that for $k>1$ the equality holds if and only if $K$ is an ellipsoid centered at the origin, and for $k=1$ the inequality turns to equality. If $p=0$, then the inequality reduces to the Busemann intersection inequality, and if $k=d$ -- to the Busemann random simplex inequality. We also present an affine version of this inequality which similarly generalizes the Schneider inequality and the Blaschke-Grömer inequality.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.