Paper detail

Random Matrices with Log-Range Correlations, and Log-Sobolev Inequalities

Let $X_N$ be a symmetric $N\times N$ random matrix whose $\sqrt{N}$-scaled centered entries are uniformly square integrable. We prove that if the entries of $X_N$ can be partitioned into independent subsets each of size $o(\log N)$, then the empirical eigenvalue distribution of $X_N$ converges weakly to its mean in probability. This significantly extends the best previously known results on convergence of eigenvalues for matrices with correlated entries (where the partition subsets are blocks and of size $O(1)$.) we prove this result be developing a new log-Sobolev inequality, generalizing the first author's introduction of mollified log-Sobolev inequalities: we show that if $\mathbf{Y}$ is a bounded random vector and $\mathbf{Z}$ is a standard normal random vector independent from $\mathbf{Y}$, then the law of $\mathbf{Y}+t\mathbf{Z}$ satisfies a log-Sobolev inequality for all $t>0$, and we give bounds on the optimal log-Sobolev constant.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.