Paper detail

Random Geometric Graphs and Isometries of Normed Spaces

Given a countable dense subset $S$ of a finite-dimensional normed space $X$, and $0<p<1$, we form a random graph on $S$ by joining, independently and with probability $p$, each pair of points at distance less than $1$. We say that $S$ is `Rado' if any two such random graphs are (almost surely) isomorphic. Bonato and Janssen showed that in $l_\infty^d$ almost all $S$ are Rado. Our main aim in this paper is to show that $l_\infty^d$ is the unique normed space with this property: indeed, in every other space almost all sets $S$ are non-Rado. We also determine which spaces admit some Rado set: this turns out to be the spaces that have an $l_\infty$ direct summand. These results answer questions of Bonato and Janssen. A key role is played by the determination of which finite-dimensional normed spaces have the property that every bijective step-isometry (meaning that the integer part of distances is preserved) is in fact an isometry. This result may be of independent interest.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.