Paper detail

Random death process for the regularization of subdiffusive anomalous equations

Subdiffusive fractional equations are not structurally stable with respect to spatial perturbations to the anomalous exponent (Phys. Rev. E 85, 031132 (2012)). The question arises of applicability of these fractional equations to model real world phenomena. To rectify this problem we propose the inclusion of the random death process into the random walk scheme from which we arrive at the modified fractional master equation. We analyze the asymptotic behavior of this equation, both analytically and by Monte Carlo simulation, and show that this equation is structurally stable against spatial variations of anomalous exponent. Additionally, in the continuous and long time limit we arrived at an unusual advection-diffusion equation, where advection and diffusion coefficients depend on both the death rate and anomalous exponent. We apply the regularized fractional master equation to the problem of morphogen gradient formation.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.