Paper detail

Rainbow gravity corrections to the information flux of a black hole and the sparsity of Hawking radiation

In this paper, by utilizing the rainbow functions that were proposed by Amelino-Camelia \emph{et al}., the information flux of rainbow Schwarzschild black hole and the sparsity of Hawking radiation in rainbow gravity are explored. The results show that the rainbow gravity has a very significant effect on the information flux. When the mass of rainbow Schwarzschild black hole approaches to the order of Planck scale, the Bekenstein entropy loss per emitted quanta in terms of the mass of Schwarzschild black hole reduces to zero. Furthermore, we also find the sparsity of Hawking radiation in rainbow gravity is no longer a constant; instead, it monotonically decreases as the mass of black hole decrease. At the final stages of evaporation, the modified sparsity becomes infinity, which indicates the effect of quantum gravity stops Hawking radiation and leads to remnant.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.