Paper detail

RAGR: Review-Augmented Generative Recommendation

Sequential recommendation (SR) is traditionally formulated as next-item prediction over a chronological sequence of interacted items. Although recent generative recommendation (GR) methods introduce new machinery, such as semantic IDs, autoregressive decoding, and unified token spaces, they largely inherit the same item-only modeling assumption. We argue that this design constitutes a structural bottleneck, because user decision-making is not purely behavioral: while item interactions reveal what users choose, review feedback often explain why they choose it by exposing latent evaluative factors. Motivated by this observation, we propose Review-Augmented Generative Recommendation (RAGR), a novel GR framework that incorporates review feedback directly into the generative user sequence rather than treating reviews as auxiliary side information. Specifically, RAGR introduces a Review-Augmented User Sequence Modeling mechanism that interleaves item semantic IDs and review semantic IDs in chronological order to construct a mixed behavioral-semantic sequence, enabling review signals to participate directly in autoregressive next-token generation. To preserve the recommendation objective, we further introduce an Item-Centric Task Generation Alignment strategy based on direct preference optimization (DPO), which encourages the model to favor item tokens over review tokens at prediction positions. Experiments on three real-world datasets show that RAGR yields consistent and significant gains over strong GR backbones across all metrics. Our code and data are available at \url{https://github.com/Zhang-Yingyi/TKDE_RAGR}.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.