Paper detail

Radiative energy loss and v2 spectra for viscous hydrodynamics

This work investigates the first correction to the equilibrium phase space distribution and its effects on spectra and elliptic flow in heavy ion collisions. We show that the departure from equilibrium on the freezeout surface is the largest part of the viscous corrections to $v_2(p_T)$. However, the momentum dependence of the departure from equilibrium is not known {\it a priori}, and it is probably not proportional to $p_T^2$ as has been assumed in hydrodynamic simulations. At high momentum in weakly coupled plasmas it is determined by the rate of radiative energy loss and is proportional to $p_T^{3/2}$. The weaker $p_T$ dependence leads to straighter $v_2(p_T)$ curves at the same value of viscosity. Further, the departure from equilibrium is generally species dependent. A species dependent equilibration rate, with baryons equilibrating faster than mesons, can explain ``constituent quark scaling'' without invoking coalescence models.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.