Paper detail

Radiation dynamics in fast soliton collisions in the presence of cubic loss

We study the dynamics of emission of radiation (small-amplitude waves) in fast collisions between two solitons of the nonlinear Schrödinger (NLS) equation in the presence of weak cubic loss. We calculate the radiation dynamics by a perturbation technique with two small parameters: the cubic loss coefficient $ε_{3}$ and the reciprocal of the group velocity difference $1/β$. The agreement between the perturbation theory predictions and the results of numerical simulations with the full coupled-NLS propagation model is very good for large $β$ values, and is good for intermediate $β$ values. Additional numerical simulations with four simplified NLS models show that the differences between perturbation theory and simulations for intermediate $β$ values are due to the effects of Kerr nonlinearity on interpulse interaction in the collision. Thus, our study demonstrates that the perturbation technique that was originally developed to study radiation dynamics in fast soliton collisions in the presence of conservative perturbations can also be employed for soliton collisions in the presence of dissipative perturbations.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.