Paper detail

Radiation dose estimation in pencil beam x-ray luminescence computed tomography imaging

Pencil x-ray beam imaging provides superior spatial resolution than other imaging geometries like sheet beam and cone beam geometries due to the illumination of a line instead of an area or volume. However, the pencil beam geometry suffers from long scan times and concerns over dose discourage laboratory use of pencil beam x-ray sources. Molecular imaging techniques like XLCT imaging benefit most from pencil beam imaging to accurately localize the distribution of contrast agents embedded in a small animal object. To investigate the dose deposited by pencil beam x-ray imaging in XLCT, dose estimations from one angular projection scan by three different x-ray source energies were performed on a small animal object composed of water, bone, and blood with a Monte Carlo simulation platform, GATE (Geant4 Application for Tomographic Emission). Our results indicate that, with an adequate x-ray benchtop source with high brilliance and quasi-monochromatic properties like the Sigray source, the dose concerns can be reduced. With the Sigray source, the bone marrow was estimated to have a radiation dose of 30 mGy for a typical XLCT imaging, in which we have 6 angular projections, 100 micrometer scan step size, and 10^6 x-ray photons per linear scan.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.