Paper detail

Radially Excited States of $η_c$

In the framework of chiral quark model, the mass spectrum of $η_c(ns) (n=1,...,6)$ is studied with Gaussian expansion method. With the wave functions obtained in the study of mass spectrum, the open flavor two-body strong decay widths are calculated by using $^3P_0$ model. The results show that the masses of $η_c(1S)$ and $η_c(2S)$ are consistent with the experimental data. The explanation of X(3940) as $η_c(3S)$ is disfavored for X(3940) is a narrow state, $Γ=37^{+26}_{-15} \pm 8 $ MeV, while the open flavor two-body strong decay width of $η_c(3S)$ is about 200 MeV in our calculation. Although the mass of X(4160) is about 100 MeV less than that of $η_c(4S)$, the assignment of X(4160) as $η_c(4S)$ can not be excluded because the open flavor two-body strong decay width of $η_c(4S)$ is consistent with the experimental value of X(4160) and the branching ratios of $η_c(4S)$ are compatible with that of X(4160), and the mass of $η_c(4S)$ can be shifted downwards by taking into account the coupling effect of the open charm channels. There are still no good candidates to $η_c(5S)$ and $η_c(6S)$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.