Paper detail

Radial rapid decay does not imply rapid decay

We provide a new, dynamical criterion for the radial rapid decay property. We work out in detail the special case of the group $Γ:= \mathbf{SL}_2(A)$, where $A := \mathbb{F}_q[X,X^{-1}]$ is the ring of Laurent polynomials with coefficients in $\mathbb{F}_q$, endowed with the length function coming from a natural action of $Γ$ on a product of two trees, to show that is has the radial rapid decay (RRD) property and doesn't have the rapid decay (RD) property. The criterion also applies to irreducible lattices in semisimple Lie groups with finite center endowed with a length function defined with the help of a Finsler metric. These examples answer a question asked by Chatterji and moreover show that, unlike the RD property, the RRD property isn't inherited by open subgroups.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.