Paper detail

RA-CMF: Region-Adaptive Conditional MeanFlow for CT Image Reconstruction

The use of CT imaging is important for screening, diagnosis, therapy planning, and prognosis of lung cancers. Unfortunately, due to differences in imaging protocols and scanner models, CT images acquired by different means may show large differences in noise statistics, contrast, and texture. In this study, we develop a novel conditional MeanFlow pipeline for CT image reconstruction. We introduce a conditional MeanFlow network that models the enhancement trajectory by predicting image-conditioned flow fields given intermediate image states. The image enhancement network is trained with a MeanFlow consistency loss along with the image reconstruction loss. In order to provide an adaptive refinement process in terms of spatial location of enhancements, we integrate a regional reinforcement learning-driven policy network into our approach. The policy network receives information about the MeanFlow rollouts and provides predictions in terms of tile-wise refinement budgets, stopping criteria, and total budget allocation of enhancement processes. Our policy network is trained through reinforcement learning in a policy gradient framework, where the goal of the training reward is to maximize improvement of enhancements while minimizing unnecessary computations and avoiding instabilities. In this way, our approach combines conditional flow-based enhancement with reinforcement learning-based spatial enhancement control. This allows our approach to focus more attention on enhancing difficult areas while stabilizing areas already showing sufficient quality. Our results show high accuracy in the tumor ROI, with the average radiomic feature CCC being 0.96, an average PSNR of 31.30 $\pm$ 4.16, and average SSIM of 0.94 $\pm$ 0.07. Moreover, there is an improvement in the overall quality of images, with an average PSNR of 34.23 $\pm$ 1.71 and average SSIM of 0.95 $\pm$ 0.01.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.