Paper detail

$R_{e^+ e^-}$ and an effective QCD charge

We consider the electron-positron annihilation process into hadrons $R_{e^+e^-}$ up to $\mathcal{O}(α_{s}^{3})$ and we adopt the smearing method suggest by Poggio, Quinn and Weinberg to confront the experimental data with theory. As a theoretical model we use a QCD coupling constant frozen in the low energy regime, where this coupling can be parameterised in terms of an effective dynamical gluon mass ($m_g$) which is determined through Schwinger-Dyson equations. In order to find the best fit between experimental data and theory we perform a $χ^2$ study, that, within the uncertainties of the approach, has a minimum value when $m_g/Λ_{QCD}$ is in the range $1.2 \, - \, 1.4$. These values are in agreement with other phenomenological determinations of this ratio and lead to an infrared effective charge $α_s(0) \approx 0.7$. We comment how this effective charge may affect the global duality mass scale that indicates the frontier between perturbative and non-perturbative physics.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.