Paper detail

Quenching of Gamow-Teller strengths and two particle -- two hole configurations

We apply the charge-exchange subtracted second random-phase approximation (SSRPA), based on Skyrme functionals, to investigate Gamow-Teller resonances in several closed-shell and closed-subshell nuclei, located in different regions of the nuclear chart. After having discussed the SSRPA findings obtained within different approximation schemes in $^{48}$Ca, we compare our results with {\it{ab-initio}} coupled-cluster predictions available for C and O isotopes, where two-body currents are included. Our integrated strenghts, obtained by using one-body transition operators, are lower compared to the corresponding {\it{ab-initio}} results. This indicates that, within our model, quenching effects are mainly driven by the inclusion of two particle - two hole configurations and that the role of a two-body contribution in the transition operator is less important than in the coupled-cluster approach. By analyzing heavier nuclei, $^{90}$ Zr and $^{132}$Sn, we confirm the same conclusions that we have recently drawn for $^{48}$Ca: the inclusion of two particle - two hole configurations is very effective in our model for providing strengths which are significantly more quenched than in other theoretical models and, thus, in better agreement with the experimental measurements. This occurs because two particle - two hole configurations have a density which strongly increases with the excitation energy. Their inclusion thus pushes a significant amount of the strength to higher energies, compared to what happens in other theoretical models, reducing in this way the cumulative sum of the strength up to excitation energies around 20-30 MeV.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.