Paper detail

Quaternary borocarbides: a testbed for DFT for superconductors

Using ab-initio density functional theory for superconductors (SCDFT), we systematically study the quaternary borocarbides $RM_2$B$_2$C. Treating the retarded (frequency-dependent) interaction $W(ω)$ within the random-phase approximation (RPA), we find good agreement with experiments for the calculated superconducting critical temperature $T_c$ in the nonmagnetic Ni- and Pd-based compounds. We argue that the problem of accurately placing the $f$-bands within DFT, and possibly the lack of an explicit magnetic pair-breaking mechanism, explain the difficulties of SCDFT in reproducing $T_c$ in members of the magnetic $R$Ni$_2$B$_2$C series ($R$ rare-earth with partially filled $4f$). While the calculated $T_c$ is overestimated, SCDFT qualitatively captures the experimentally observed trend along the rare-earth series, which indicates that the electron-phonon couplings and dynamically screened interactions have a significant effect on $T_c$.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.