Paper detail

Quasiparticle self-consistent $GW$ band structures and high-pressure phase transitions of LiGaO$_2$ and NaGaO$_2

Quasi-particle self-consistent $GW$ calculations are presented for the band structures of LiGaO2 and NaGaO2 in the orthorhombic $Pna2_1$ tetrahedrally coordinated crystal structures. Symmetry labeling of the bands near the gap is carried out and effective mass tensors are extracted for the conduction band minimum and crystal field split valence band maxima at $Γ$. The gap is found to be direct at $Γ$ and is 5.81 eV in LiGaO2 and 5.46 eV in NaGaO2. Electron-phonon coupling zero-point normalization is estimated to lower these gaps by about 0.2 eV. Optical response functions are calculated within the independent particle long wavelength limit and show the expected anisotropy of the absorption onsets due to the crystal field splitting of the VBM. The results show that both materials are promising candidates as ultrawide gap semiconductors with wurtzite based tetrahedrally bonded crystal structures. Direct transitions from the lowest conduction band to higher bands, relevant to n-type doped material and transparent conduction applications are found to start only above 3.9 eV and are allowed for only one polarization, and several higher band transitions are forbidden by symmetry. Alternative crystal structures, such as $R\bar{3}m$ and a rocksalt type phase with tetragonally distorted $P4/mmm$ spacegroup, both with octahedral coordination of the cations are also investigated. They are found to have higher energy but about 20 \% smaller volume per formula unit. The transition pressures to these phases are determined and for LiGaO2 found to be in good agreement with experimental studies. The $R\bar{3}m$phase also has a comparably high but slightly indirect band gap while the rocksalt type phase if found to have a considerably smaller gap of about 3.1 eV in LiGaO2 and 1.0 eV in NaGaO2.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.