Paper detail

Quasiparticle interfacial level alignment of highly hybridized frontier levels: H$_2$O on TiO$_2$(110)

Knowledge of the frontier levels' alignment prior to photo-irradiation is necessary to achieve a complete quantitative description of H$_2$O photocatalysis on TiO$_2$(110). Although H$_2$O on rutile TiO$_2$(110) has been thoroughly studied both experimentally and theoretically, a quantitative value for the energy of the highest H$_2$O occupied levels is still lacking. For experiment, this is due to the H$_2$O levels being obscured by hybridization with TiO$_2$(110) levels in the difference spectra obtained via ultraviolet photoemission spectroscopy (UPS). For theory, this is due to inherent difficulties in properly describing many-body effects at the H$_2$O-TiO$_2$(110) interface. Using the projected density of states (DOS) from state-of-the-art quasiparticle (QP) $G_0W_0$, we disentangle the adsorbate and surface contributions to the complex UPS spectra of H$_2$O on TiO$_2$(110). We perform this separation as a function of H$_2$O coverage and dissociation on stoichiometric and reduced surfaces. Due to hybridization with the TiO$_2$(110) surface, the H$_2$O 3a$_1$ and 1b$_1$ levels are broadened into several peaks between 5 and 1 eV below the TiO$_2$(110) valence band maximum (VBM). These peaks have both intermolecular and interfacial bonding and antibonding character. We find the highest occupied levels of H$_2$O adsorbed intact and dissociated on stoichiometric TiO$_2$(110) are 1.1 and 0.9 eV below the VBM. We also find a similar energy of 1.1 eV for the highest occupied levels of H$_2$O when adsorbed dissociatively on a bridging O vacancy of the reduced surface. In both cases, these energies are significantly higher (by 0.6 to 2.6 eV) than those estimated from UPS difference spectra, which are inconclusive in this energy region. Finally, we apply self-consistent QP$GW$ (scQP$GW$1) to obtain the ionization potential of the H$_2$O-TiO$_2$(110) interface.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.