Paper detail

Quasi-optimal convergence rate for adaptive mixed finite element methods

For adaptive mixed finite element methods (AMFEM), we first introduce the data oscillation to analyze, without the restriction that the inverse of the coefficient matrix of the partial differential equations (PDEs) is a piecewise polynomial matrix, efficiency of the a posteriori error estimator Presented by Carstensen [Math. Comput., 1997, 66: 465-476] for Raviart-Thomas, Brezzi-Douglas-Morini, Brezzi-Douglas-Fortin-Marini elements. Second, we prove that the sum of the stress variable error in a weighted norm and the scaled error estimator is of geometric decay, namely, it reduces with a fixed factor between two successive adaptive loops, up to an oscillation of the right-hand side term of the PDEs. Finally, with the help of this geometric decay, we show that the stress variable error in a weighted norm plus the oscillation of data yields a decay rate in terms of the number of degrees of freedom as dictated by the best approximation for this combined nonlinear quantity

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.