Paper detail

Quasi-Maximum Likelihood Estimation for a Genuinely Unbalanced Dynamic Network Panel Data Model

This paper develops a quasi-maximum likelihood estimator for genuinely unbalanced dynamic network panel data models with individual fixed effects. We propose a model that accommodates contemporaneous and lagged network spillovers, temporal dependence, and a listing effect that activates upon a unit's first appearance in the panel. We establish the consistency of the QMLE as both $N$ and $T$ go to infinity, derive its asymptotic distribution, and identify an asymptotic bias arising from incidental parameters when $N$ is asymptotically large relative to $T$. Based on the asymptotic bias expression, we propose a bias-corrected estimator that is asymptotically unbiased and normally distributed under appropriate regularity conditions. Monte Carlo experiments examine the finite sample performance of the bias-corrected estimator across different criteria, including bias, RMSE, coverage probability, and the normality of the estimator. The empirical application to Airbnb listings from New Zealand and New York City reveals region-specific patterns in spatial and temporal price transmission, illustrating the importance of modeling genuine unbalancedness in dynamic network settings.

preprint2025arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.