Paper detail

Quark-flavour violating Higgs decays to charm and bottom pairs in the MSSM

We calculate the decay width of $h^0 \to b \bar{b}$ in the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) with quark-flavour violation (QFV) at full one-loop level. The effect of $\tilde{c}-\tilde{t}$ mixing and $\tilde{s}-\tilde{b}$ mixing is studied taking into account the constraints from the B-meson data. We discuss and compare in detail the decays $h^0 \to c \bar{c}$ and $h^0 \to b \bar{b}$ within the framework of the perturbative mass insertion technique using the Flavour Expansion Theorem. The deviation of both decay widths from the Standard Model results can be quite large. While in $h^0 \to c \bar{c}$ it is almost entirely due to the flavour violating part of the MSSM, in $h^0 \to b \bar{b}$ it is mainly due to the flavour conserving part. Nevertheless, $Γ(h^0 \to b \bar{b})$ can fluctuate up to $\sim 7\%$ due to QFV chargino exchange with large $\tilde{c}-\tilde{t}$ mixing. due to QFV chargino exchange with large $\tilde{c}-\tilde{t}$ mixing.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.