Paper detail

Quark flavour observables in the Littlest Higgs model with T-parity after LHC Run 1

The Littlest Higgs Model with T-parity (LHT) belongs to the simplest new physics scenarios with new sources of flavour and CP violation. We present a new analysis of quark observables in the LHT model in view of the oncoming flavour precision era. We use all available information on the CKM parameters, lattice QCD input and experimental data on quark flavour observables and corresponding theoretical calculations, taking into account new lower bounds on the symmetry breaking scale and the mirror quark masses from the LHC. We investigate by how much the branching ratios for a number of rare $K$ and $B$ decays are still allowed to depart from their SM values. This includes $K^+\toπ^+ν\barν$, $K_L\toπ^0ν\barν$, $K_L\to μ^+μ^-$, $ε'/ε$, $B\to X_sγ$, $B_{s,d}\toμ^+μ^-$, $B\to K^{(*)}\ell^+\ell^-$, $B\to K^{(*)}ν\barν$. Taking into account the constraints from $ΔF=2$ processes, significant departures from the SM predictions for $K^+\toπ^+ν\barν$ and $K_L\toπ^0ν\barν$ are possible while the effects in $B$ decays are much smaller. In particular, the LHT model favours $\mathcal{B}(B_{s}\toμ^+μ^-) \ge \mathcal{B}(B_{s}\toμ^+μ^-)_{\rm SM}$, which is not supported by the data, and the present anomalies in $B\to K^{(*)}\ell^+\ell^-$ decays cannot be explained in this model. With the recent lattice and large $N$ input the imposition of the $ε'/ε$ constraint implies a significant suppression of the branching ratio for $K_L\toπ^0ν\barν$ with respect to its SM value while allowing only for small modifications for $K^+\toπ^+ν\barν$. Finally, we investigate how the LHT physics could be distinguished from other models by means of indirect measurements and discuss the consequences for quark flavour observables of not finding any LHT state in the coming years.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.