Paper detail

Quark and lepton flavors with common modulus $τ$ in $A_4$ modular symmetry

We study quark and lepton mass matrices with the common modulus $τ$ in the $A_4$ modular symmetry. The viable quark mass matrices are composed of modular forms of weights $2$, $4$ and $6$. It is remarked that the modulus $τ$ is close to $i$, which is a fixed point in the fundamental region of SL$(2,Z)$, and the CP symmetry is not violated. Indeed, the observed CP violation is reproduced at $τ$ which is deviated a little bit from $τ=i$. The charged lepton mass matrix is also given by using modular forms of weights $2$, $4$ and $6$, where five cases have been examined. The neutrino mass matrix is generated in terms of the modular forms of weight $4$ through the Weinberg operator. Lepton mass matrices are also consistent with the observed mixing angles at $τ$ close to $i$ for NH of neutrino masses. Allowed regions of $τ$ of quarks and leptons overlap each other for all cases of the charged lepton mass matrix. However, the sum of neutrino masses is crucial to test the common $τ$ for quarks and leptons. The minimal sum of neutrino masses $\sum m_i$ is $140$meV at the common $τ$. The inverted hierarchy of neutrino masses is unfavorable in our framework. It is emphasized that our result suggests the residual symmetry $\mathbb{Z}_2^{S}=\{ I, S \}$ in the quark and lepton mass matrices.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.