Paper detail

Quantum vacuum energy and geometry of extra dimension

We discuss the cancellation of the ultraviolet cutoff scale $Λ_{\rm cut}$ in the calculation of the expectation value of the five-dimensional (5D) energy-momentum tensor $\langle T_{MN}\rangle$ ($M,N=0,1,\cdots,4$). Since 5D fields feel the background geometry differently depending on their spins, the bosonic and the fermionic contributions to the $Λ_{\rm cut}$-dependent part $\langle T_{MN}\rangle^{\rm UV}$ may have different profiles in the extra dimension. In that case, there is no chance for them to be cancelled with each other. We consider arbitrary numbers of scalar and spinor fields with arbitrary bulk masses, calculate $\langle T_{MN}\rangle$ using the 5D propagators, and clarify the dependence of $\langle T_{MN}\rangle^{\rm UV}$ on the extra-dimensional coordinate $y$ for a general background geometry of the extra dimension. We find that if the geometry is not flat nor (a slice of) anti-de Sitter (AdS) space, it is impossible to cancel $\langle T_{MN}\rangle^{\rm UV}$ between the bosonic and the fermionic contributions. This may suggest that the flat (or AdS) space is energetically favored over the other geometries, and thus the dynamics forces the compact space to be flat (or AdS).

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.