Paper detail

Quantum Steenrod squares and the equivariant pair-of-pants in symplectic cohomology

We relate the quantum Steenrod square to Seidel's equivariant pair-of-pants product for open convex symplectic manifolds that are either monotone or exact, using an equivariant version of the PSS isomorphism. We proceed similarly for $\mathbb{Z}/2$-equivariant symplectic cohomology, using an equivariant version of the continuation and $c^*$-maps. We prove a symplectic Cartan relation, pointing out the difficulties in stating it. We give a nonvanishing result for the equivariant pair-of-pants product for some elements of $SH^*(T^* S^n)$. We finish by calculating the symplectic square for the negative line bundles $M = \text{Tot}(\mathcal{O}(-1) \rightarrow \mathbb{CP}^m)$, proving an equivariant version of a result due to Ritter.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.