Paper detail

Quantum Spontaneous Stochasticity

The quantum wave-function of a massive particle with small initial uncertainties (consistent with the uncertainty relation) is believed to spread very slowly, so that the dynamics is deterministic. This assumes that the classical motions for given initial data are unique. In fluid turbulence non-uniqueness due to "roughness" of the advecting velocity field is known to lead to stochastic motion of classical particles. Vanishingly small random perturbations are magnified by Richardson diffusion in a "nearly rough" velocity field so that motion remains stochastic as the noise disappears, or classical spontaneous stochasticity, . Analogies between stochastic particle motion in turbulence and quantum evolution suggest that there should be quantum spontaneous stochasticity (QSS). We show this for 1D models of a particle in a repulsive potential that is "nearly rough" with $V(x) \sim C|x|^{1+α}$ at distances $|x|\gg \ell$ , for some UV cut-off $\ell$, and for initial Gaussian wave-packet centered at 0. We consider the WKB limit with $\hbar/m \to 0$, then position-spread $σ\to 0$. The limit of the position density is non-deterministic, with equal probabilities of the particle following either of two, non-unique classical solutions and with "Richardson-like" spreading of the wave-packet. The splitting of the wave-packet occurs in a very short time $t\sim(\ell^{1+α}/C)^{1/2}$ for small $\ell$. QSS also occurs in the scattering of a wave-packet off the rough potential, for careful fine-tuning. We also consider other semi-classical limits by a numerical solution of the Schrödinger equation, observing QSS both in position- and momentum-space. Although the wave-function remains split into two widely separated branches in the classical limit, rapid phase oscillations within each branch prevent any coherent superposition. These effects should be observable in laboratory experiments.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.