Paper detail

Quantum Shuffles and Quantum Supergroups of Basic Type

We initiate the study of several distinguished bases for the positive half of a quantum supergroup $U_q$ associated to a general super Cartan datum $(\mathrm{I}, (\cdot,\cdot))$ of basic type inside a quantum shuffle superalgebra. The combinatorics of words for an arbitrary total ordering on $\mathrm{I}$ is developed in connection with the root system associated to $\mathrm{I}$. The monomial, Lyndon, and PBW bases of $U_q$ are constructed, and moreover, a direct proof of the orthogonality of the PBW basis is provided within the framework of quantum shuffles. Consequently, the canonical basis is constructed for $U_q$ associated to the standard super Cartan datum of type $\mathfrak{gl}(n|1)$, $\mathfrak{osp}(1|2n)$, or $\mathfrak{osp}(2|2n)$ or an arbitrary non-super Cartan datum. In the non-super case, this refines Leclerc's work and provides a new self-contained construction of canonical bases. The canonical bases of $U_q$, of its polynomial modules, as well as of Kac modules in the case of quantum $\mathfrak{gl}(2|1)$ are explicitly worked out.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.