Paper detail

Quantum random walk and tight-binding model subject to projective measurements at random times

What happens when a quantum system undergoing unitary evolution in time is subject to repeated projective measurements to the initial state at random times? A question of general interest is: How does the survival probability $S_m$, namely, the probability that an initial state survives even after $m$ number of measurements, behave as a function of $m$? We address these issues in the context of two paradigmatic quantum systems, one, the quantum random walk evolving in discrete time, and the other, the tight-binding model evolving in continuous time, with both defined on a one-dimensional periodic lattice with a finite number of sites $N$. For these two models, we present several numerical and analytical results that hint at the curious nature of quantum measurement dynamics. In particular, we unveil that when evolution after every projective measurement continues with the projected component of the instantaneous state, the average and the typical survival probability decay as an exponential in $m$ for large $m$. By contrast, if the evolution continues with the leftover component, namely, what remains of the instantaneous state after a measurement has been performed, the survival probability exhibits two characteristic $m$ values, namely, $m_1^\star(N) \sim N$ and $m_2^\star(N) \sim N^δ$ with $δ>1$. These scales are such that (i) for $m$ large and satisfying $m < m_1^\star(N)$, the decay of the survival probability is as $m^{-2}$, (ii) for $m$ satisfying $m_1^\star(N) \ll m < m_2^\star(N)$, the decay is as $m^{-3/2}$, while (iii) for $m \gg m_2^\star(N)$, the decay is as an exponential. We find that our results hold independently of the choice of the distribution of times between successive measurements, as have been corroborated by our results for a wide range of distributions. This fact hints at robustness and ubiquity of our derived results.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.