Paper detail

Quantum Multi-Parameter Adaptive Bayesian Estimation and Application to Super-Resolution Imaging

In Bayesian estimation theory, the estimator ${\hat θ} = E[θ|l]$ attains the minimum mean squared error (MMSE) for estimating a scalar parameter of interest $θ$ from the observation of $l$ through a noisy channel $P_{l|θ}$, given a prior $P_θ$ on $θ$. In quantum sensing tasks, the user gets $ρ_θ$, the quantum state that encodes $θ$. They choose a measurement, a positive-operator valued measure (POVM) $Π_l$, which induces the channel $P_{l|θ} = {\rm Tr}(ρ_θΠ_l)$ to the measurement outcome $l$, on which the aforesaid classical MMSE estimator is employed. Personick found the optimum POVM $Π_l$ that minimizes the MMSE over all possible measurements, and that MMSE. This result from 1971 is less-widely known than the quantum Fisher information (QFI), which lower bounds the variance of an unbiased estimator over all measurements, when $P_θ$ is unavailable. For multi-parameter estimation, i.e., when $θ$ is a vector, in Fisher quantum estimation theory, the inverse of the QFI matrix provides an operator lower bound to the covariance of an unbiased estimator. However, there has been little work on quantifying quantum limits and measurement designs, for multi-parameter quantum estimation in the {\em Bayesian} setting. In this paper, we build upon Personick's result to construct a Bayesian adaptive measurement scheme for multi-parameter estimation when $N$ copies of $ρ_θ$ are available. We illustrate an application to localizing a cluster of point emitters in a highly sub-Rayleigh angular field-of-view, an important problem in fluorescence microscopy and astronomy. Our algorithm translates to a multi-spatial-mode transformation prior to a photon-detection array, with electro-optic feedback to adapt the mode sorter. We show that this receiver performs far superior to quantum-noise-limited focal-plane direct imaging.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.