Paper detail

Quantum fluctuations approach to the nonequilibrium $GW$ approximation

The quantum dynamics of fermionic or bosonic many-body systems following external excitation can be successfully studied using two-time nonequilibrium Green's functions (NEGF) or single-time reduced density matrix methods. Approximations are introduced via a proper choice of the many-particle self-energy or decoupling of the BBGKY hierarchy. These approximations are based on Feynman's diagram approaches or on cluster expansions into single-particle and correlation operators. Here, we develop a different approach where, instead of equations of motion for the many-particle NEGF (or density operators), single-time equations for the correlation functions of fluctuations are analyzed. We present a derivation of the first two equations of the alternative hierarchy of fluctuations and discuss possible decoupling approximations. In particular, we derive the polarization approximation (PA) which is shown to be equivalent to the single-time version [following by applying the generalized Kadanoff-Baym ansatz (GKBA)] of the nonequilibrium $GW$ approximation with exchange effects of NEGF theory, for weak coupling. The main advantage of the quantum fluctuations approach is that the standard ensemble average can be replaced by a semiclassical average over different initial realizations, as was demonstrated before by Lacroix and co-workers [see e.g. D. Lacroix et al., Phys. Rev. B, 2014, 90, 125112]. Here, we introduce the stochastic $GW$ (SGW) approximation and the stochastic polarization approximation (SPA) which are demonstrated to be equivalent to the single-time $GW$ approximation without and with exchange, respectively, in the weak coupling limit. Our numerical tests confirm that our approach has the same favorable linear scaling with the computation time as the recently developed G1-G2 scheme [Schluenzen et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 2020, 124, 076601].

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.