Paper detail

Quantum Field Theory of Correlated Bose-Einstein condensates: I. Basic Formalism

Quantum field theory of equilibrium and nonequilibrium Bose-Einstein condensates is formulated so as to satisfy three basic requirements: the Hugenholtz-Pines relation; conservation laws; identities among vertices originating from Goldstone's theorem I. The key inputs are irreducible four-point vertices, in terms of which we derive a closed system of equations for Green's functions, three- and four-point vertices, and two-particle Green's functions. It enables us to study correlated Bose-Einstein condensates with a gapless branch of single-particle excitations without encountering any infrared divergence. The single- and two-particle Green's functions are found to share poles, i.e., the structure of the two-particle Green's functions predicted by Gavoret and Nozières for a homogeneous condensate at $T=0$ is also shown to persist at finite temperatures, in the presence of inhomogeneity, and also in nonequilibrium situations.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.