Paper detail

Quantum correlations in different density matrix representations of spin-1/2 open chain

We consider quantum correlations in a spin-1/2 open chain of $N$ nodes with the XY Hamiltonian using different bases for the density matrix representation and the initial state with a single polarized node. These bases of our choice are following: (i) the basis of eigenvectors of the fermion operators; this basis appears naturally through the Jordan-Wigner transformation (this representation of the density matrix is referred to as the $β$-representation), (ii) its Fourier representation ($c$-representation of the density matrix) and (iii) the basis of eigenvectors of the operators $I_{jz}$ (the $z$-projection of the $j$th spin, $j=1,...,N$). Although for the short chains (a few nodes) the qualitative behavior of the entanglement and the discord are very similar (the difference is quantitative), this is not valid for longer chains ($N\gtrsim 10$). In this case, there are qualitative and quantitative distinctions between the entanglement and the discord in all three cases. We underline three most important features: (i) the quantum discord is static in the $β$-representation, where the entanglement is identical to zero; (ii) in the $c$-representation, the concurrence may be non-zero only between the nearest neighbors (with a single exception), while the discord is nonzero between any two nodes; (iii) there is so-called "echo" in the evolution of the discord, which is not observed in the evolution of the concurrence. Using different bases, we may choose the preferable behavior of quantum correlations which allows a given quantum system to be more flexible in applications.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.