Paper detail

Quantum Corrections to the Polarizability and Dephasing in Isolated Disordered Metals

We study the quantum corrections to the polarizability of isolated metallic mesoscopic systems using the loop-expansion in diffusive propagators. We show that the difference between connected (grand-canonical ensemble) and isolated (canonical ensemble) systems appears only in subleading terms of the expansion, and can be neglected if the frequency of the external field, $ω$, is of the order of (or even slightly smaller than) the mean level spacing, $Δ$. If $ω\ll Δ$, the two-loop correction becomes important. We calculate it by systematically evaluating the ballistic parts (the Hikami boxes) of the corresponding diagrams and exploiting electroneutrality. Our theory allows one to take into account a finite dephasing rate, $γ$, generated by electron interactions, and it is complementary to the non-perturbative results obtained from a combination of Random Matrix Theory (RMT) and the $σ$-model, valid at $γ\to 0$. Remarkably, we find that the two-loop result for isolated systems with moderately weak dephasing, $γ\sim Δ$, is similar to the result of the RMT+$σ$-model even in the limit $ω\to 0$. For smaller $γ$, we discuss the possibility to interpolate between the perturbative and the non-perturbative results. We compare our results for the temperature dependence of the polarizability of isolated rings to the experimental data of Deblock \emph{et al} [\prl \ {\bf 84}, 5379 (2000); \prb \ {\bf 65}, 075301 (2002)], and we argue that the elusive 0D regime of dephasing might have manifested itself in the observed magneto-oscillations. Besides, we thoroughly discuss possible future measurements of the polarizability, which could aim to reveal the existence of 0D dephasing and the role of the Pauli blocking at small temperatures.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.