Paper detail

Quantization and High Energy Unitarity of 5D Orbifold Theories with Brane Kinetic Terms

Five-dimensional field theories compactified on an S^1/Z_2 orbifold naturally include local brane kinetic terms at the orbifold fixed points at the tree as well as the quantum level. We study the quantization of these theories before the Kaluza--Klein reduction and derive the relevant Ward and Slavnov-Taylor identities that result from the underlying gauge and Becchi-Rouet-Stora symmetries of the theory. With the help of these identities, we obtain a generalization of the equivalence theorem, where the known high-energy equivalence relation between the longitudinal Kaluza-Klein gauge modes and their respective would-be Goldstone bosons is extended to consistently include the energetically suppressed terms in the high-energy scatterings. Demanding perturbative unitarity, we compute upper limits on the number of the Kaluza-Klein modes. We find that these limits weakly depend on the size of the brane kinetic terms.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.