Paper detail

Quantitative sub-resolution blood velocity estimation using ultrasound localization microscopy ex-vivo and in-vivo

Super-resolution ultrasound imaging relies on the sub-wavelength localization of microbubble contrast agents. By tracking individual microbubbles, the velocity and flow within microvessels can be estimated. However, a 2D super-resolution image can only localize bubbles with sub-wavelength resolution in the imaging plane whereas the resolution in the elevation plane is limited by conventional beamwidth physics. Since ultrasound imaging integrates echoes over the elevation dimension, velocity estimates at a single location in the imaging plane include information throughout the imaging slice thickness. This slice thickness is typically a few orders or magnitude larger than the super-resolution limit. It is shown here that in order to estimate the velocity, a spatial integration over the elevation direction must be considered. This operation yields a multiplicative correction factor that compensates for the elevation integration. A correlation-based velocity estimation technique is then presented. Calibrated microtube phantom experiments are used to validate the proposed velocity estimation method and the proposed elevation integration correction factor. It is shown that velocity measurements are in agreement with theoretical predictions within the considered range of flow rates (10 to 90 $μ$L/min). Then, the proposed technique is applied to two in-vivo mouse tail experiments imaged with a low frequency human clinical transducer with human clinical concentrations of microbubbles. In the first experiment, a vein was visible with a diameter of 140 $μ$m and a peak flow velocity of 0.8 mm/s. In the second experiment, a vein was observed in the super-resolved image with a diameter of 120~$μ$m and with maximum local velocity of $\approx$~4.4~mm/s. It is shown that the parabolic flow profiles within these micro-vessels are resolvable.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.