Paper detail

Quantitative Morphology of Moderate Redshift Galaxies : How Many Peculiars are There ?

The advent of the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) has provided images of galaxies at moderate and high redshifts and changed the scope of galaxy morphologies considerably. It is evident that the Hubble Sequence requires modifications in order to incorporate all the various morphologies one encounters at such redshifts. We investigate and compare different approaches to quantifying peculiar galaxy morphologies on images obtained from the Medium Deep Survey (MDS) and other surveys using the Wide Field Planetary Camera 2 (WFPC2) on board the HST, in the I band (filter F814W). We define criteria for peculiarity and put them to use on a sample of 978 galaxies, classifying them by eye as either normal or peculiar. Based on our criteria and on concepts borrowed from digital image processing we design a set of four purely morphological parameters, which comprise the overall texture (or ``blobbiness'') of the image; the distortion of isophotes; the filling-factor of isophotes; and the skeleta of detected structures. We also examine the parameters suggested by Abraham et al. (1995). An artificial neural network (ANN) is trained to distinguish between normal and peculiar galaxies. While the majority of peculiar galaxies are disk-dominated, we also find evidence for a significant population of bulge-dominated peculiars. Consequently, peculiar galaxies do not all form a ``natural'' continuation of the Hubble sequence beyond the late spirals and the irregulars. The trained neural network is applied to a second, larger sample of 1999 WFPC2 images and its probabilistic capabilities are used to estimate the frequency of peculiar galaxies at moderate redshifts as $35 \pm 15 %$.

preprint1996arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.