BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

A. Naim

A. Naim contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
1topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint1996arXiv

What is a Peculiar Galaxy ?

Following the recent surge of interest in peculiar galaxies at high redshifts we consider the definition, or lack thereof, of morphological peculiarities on a sample of local universe galaxies. Studying the morphology of local universe galaxies is also of interest in trying to understand galaxy dynamics and quantifying the relations between morphology and environment. We use classifications given by five experts for a sample of 827 APM galaxies and find that there is little agreement between them on what qualifies as a peculiar galaxy. We attempt several objective approaches : matching galaxy images to ``templates''; examinig the 180-degree Asymmetry against Light Concentration (following Abraham et al. 1995); and exploring angle-dependent asymmetry measures. While none of the quantities we use results in a clean distinction between normal and peculiar galaxies, there is a rough correlation between some parameters and image peculiarity. However, the mixing between the two classes is significant. We conclude that the class of peculiar galaxies is not totally distinct from the class of normal galaxies, and that what we are seeing is really a sequence. It is therefore more useful to consider distribution functions of morphological parameters. The current and possibly other, more accurate parametrisations require better data, which is becoming available through CCD imaging.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1995arXiv

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF MORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATIONS OF APM GALAXIES

We investigate the consistency of visual morphological classifications of galaxies by comparing classifications for 831 galaxies from six independent observers. The galaxies were classified on laser print copy images or on computer screen produced from scans with the Automated Plate Measuring (APM) machine. Classifications are compared using the Revised Hubble numerical type index T. We find that individual observers agree with one another with rms combined dispersions of between 1.3 and 2.3 type units, typically about 1.8 units. The dispersions tend to decrease slightly with increasing angular diameter and, in some cases, with increasing axial ratio $(b/a)$. The agreement between independent observers is reasonably good but the scatter is non-negligible. In spite of the scatter the Revised Hubble T system can be used to train an automated galaxy classifier, e.g. an Artificial Neural Network, to handle the large number of galaxy images that are being compiled in the APM and other surveys.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1995arXiv

AUTOMATED MORPHOLOGICAL CLASSIFICATION OF APM GALAXIES BY SUPERVISED ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORKS

We train Artificial Neural Networks to classify galaxies based solely on the morphology of the galaxy images as they appear on blue survey plates. The images are reduced and morphological features such as bulge size and the number of arms are extracted, all in a fully automated manner. The galaxy sample was first classified by 6 independent experts. We use several definitions for the mean type of each galaxy, based on those classifications. We then train and test the network on these features. We find that the rms error of the network classifications, as compared with the mean types of the expert classifications, is 1.8 Revised Hubble Types. This is comparable to the overall rms dispersion between the experts. This result is robust and almost completely independent of the network architecture used.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint1995arXiv

Neural computation as a tool for galaxy classification : methods and examples

We apply and compare various Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and other algorithms for automatic morphological classification of galaxies. The ANNs are presented here mathematically, as non-linear extensions of conventional statistical methods in Astronomy. The methods are illustrated using different subsets Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and other algorithms for automatic morphological classification of galaxies. The ANNs are presented here mathematically, as non-linear extensions of conventional statistical methods in Astronomy. The methods are illustrated using different subsets from the ESO-LV catalogue, for which both machine parameters and human classification are available. The main methods we explore are: (i) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) which tells how independent and informative the input parameters are. (ii) Encoder Neural Network which allows us to find both linear (PCA-like) and non-linear combinations of the input, illustrating an example of unsupervised ANN. (iii) Supervised ANN (using the Backpropagation or Quasi-Newton algorithms) based on a training set for which the human classification is known. Here the output for previously unclassified galaxies can be interpreted as either a continuous (analog) output (e.g. $T$-type) or a Bayesian {\it a posteriori} probability for each class. Although the ESO-LV parameters are sub-optimal, the success of the ANN in reproducing the human classification is 2 $T$-type units, similar to the degree of agreement between two human experts who classify the same galaxy images on plate material. We also examine the aspects of ANN configurations, reproducibility, scaling of input parameters and redshift information.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access